THE samaccheer kalvi issue which is going in high/supreme courts and COST OF EDUCATION VERY HIGH cries problem. the purpose of education is primarily to secur a good career evertbody wants to sit in the palanquin and nobody wants to be a lifter of palanquin .so for securing an excellant job you have to undergo selection process .the way of answering is of 3 types.give the correctanswer, give the best answer and giving the best answer in a way of effective presentation and naturally the selectors will eye only on the 3rd one ok? educations are of two types 1.govt/corporation/muncipal.panchayat union schools and private matriculation schools the first one is free the second one is paid one there is a huge cry that the schools loot the parents still there is a heavy rush for private schools why? the free schools have qualified teachers they teach how to answer correct answers. they get higher pay in GENERAL their attitude rests with teaching correct answers. even if all the students fail or pass with average marks , the teachers in GENERAL are not worried or no responsibility in private schools the teacher are over qualified. lowly paid and work very hard. they aim for effective way of presentation of best answers. even if all the students get more than 60% we are not sure in GENERAL whether they are happy or with no risk or responsibility they have to work further hard and improve further ok? now the attitudes of student and the responsibility of govt in GENERAL majority of students want less hard work but secure best job so they think that the quality of answers such as correct or best or way of presentation are hurdles . so they hate it and want to remove it. example take a best matriculation school and all the students are excellant. but there is also 2types one who get more than 90% and the rest is less than 90% the latter is majority and they want the 1st quality to be removed as they are hurdles for 2nd so they want a change in selection processing so that all will get equal opportunity . so the syllabus/method of exam should be changed then only they can edge out the best/crush the best ones down and get the satisfaction. what is the solution ? i think it is the reason for samaccheer kalvi. it is only my view and you need not accept or it need not be correct . so the testing subject should be changed in such a way there need not be best answers/way of effective presetation example for 2 marks the question is capital of india it may be a 1 word answer. 1 sentence or a short notes 1 answer simply new delhi the answerer is not bothored to construct even it as a sentance as he is not sure of construction a sentance without mistake or not bothored about it. but he is able to give correct aswer 2. india's capital is newdelhi. here he is able to give correct answer and also able to construct a sentance without any mistake. 3. india's capital is new delhi. it is situated at a lattitude of ..... longitude of ......... on the banks of river ......... and has a population of ........... it is formerly known as indraprastha in olden days. here the answer is correct. it is best answer also and look at the way of presentation. so naturally the third person ALONE has to be selected he is one where as the rejected are more or majority so they want to edge him out or crush him down how is it you change the process of selection the question should be choose the correct answer multioptions the capital of india is a chennai b mumbai c new delhi d kolkatta if the selection of process is changed like this then ONLY it is possible to edgeout the 3rd category and crush him out because it has no opportunity to best answer selection or effective way of presentation now the govt responsibility - will it want the ability/or talent to improve more and more and the competition to be much more keen or simply want to SUPPORT THE MAJORITY? your valuable discussions/arguements are very much appreciated Mr. balan welcome for your ideas. but my question is why not the govt and its tamil medium teachers try to improve the standards of tamil medium students instead of clipping the wings of matriculation students is my question u don't give ur e mail id to share my concern and views will u look at this i wonder